Corrections policy
How to report an error on this site, how quickly we respond, and how corrections are recorded on the page itself.
Short answer
Short answer
Last checked 13 October 2026. Providers can change prices without notice; confirm current figures before you buy.
What counts as a correction
Corrections are essential to maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the information we provide to our audience, especially small business owners and professionals in the UK. A factual error can include a wrong rate, an outdated fee, a superseded promotional term, a specification that does not match the manufacturer's details, or a broken commercial link. It's vital to note that disagreement with a verdict is categorized as feedback rather than a correction, although it remains important to us, and we consistently review such feedback to improve our content.
We draw a clear distinction between three key concepts: a correction, which addresses something that was incorrect when first published; an update, which reflects subsequent changes, such as a provider altering their pricing or terms; and feedback, which usually involves a difference of judgement or interpretation. While all three are valuable inputs, only the first two will prompt a change in the factual content of our pages.
In addition, reporting typos and broken layouts, while not termed corrections in the editorial sense, contributes to enhancing the user experience and are always swiftly addressed.
Accurate information is crucial for making informed financial decisions. We encourage you to report any information that seems inaccurate or outdated.
For our UK-based audience, it's especially relevant to pay attention to any changes in VAT rates, banking charges, or other financial specifications that directly affect your business operations. These corrections help us ensure our platform remains a reliable resource for you.
How to report one
To report a correction, please email editor@paymentcardreader.co.uk with the page URL, the specific sentence you believe contains an error, and, if possible, a link to the official source of accurate information. Providers and business owners are encouraged to use the same contact details for reporting corrections.
A report will be processed more efficiently if it includes the exact URL of the page in question, a direct quote of the sentence you believe is incorrect, and a primary source for verification — this could be a provider’s pricing page, a terms document, or a publication from a regulatory body. Most corrections concerning pricing are resolved within a day when these elements are provided.
If the issue relates to a promotion, please provide evidence of what was offered by the provider and when, as promotional terms can change rapidly. A screenshot with a date stamp is invaluable as evidence.
Quick and accurate reporting not only helps us maintain the quality of our information but also ensures that other businesses are provided with the most reliable data.
Remember to keep any updates on UK financial regulations or VAT changes handy, as these can significantly affect the accuracy of the content related to financial products.
What happens next
Upon receipt of a correction report, we acknowledge it within two working days and verify the details against official documentation. Depending on our findings, we will either correct the page, remove the disputed claim, or explain our rationale for why the current content remains valid. When the accuracy of a quantifiable promotional claim is in question, we suppress it from public view while conducting our checks rather than risk distributing potentially misleading information.
Our prioritization process is based on the potential for financial harm or misinformation. Urgent attention is given to issues like incorrect rates, misleading promotional thresholds, or broken commercial links due to their direct impact on financial decision-making. Conversely, issues like outdated specifications or expired screenshots are slated for updates during the next regular review of the page.
Irrespective of our decision on the correction, you will receive a comprehensive response. If we uphold the current content, we will supply detailed reasoning and any supporting documentation that influenced our decision instead of merely closing the matter.
Your involvement in reporting inaccuracies is crucial to maintaining a trustworthy knowledge base for all users. Transparency is our priority, and we aim to update and inform you through each step.
How corrections are recorded
Significant corrections are transparently noted on the page with the date of the change while updating the reviewed date in the editorial box. Furthermore, changes to offers are logged in our central offer record to ensure that alterations are universally applied across all relevant pages.
By storing promotional figures in a central database, we ensure that updates are uniformly applied site-wide, preventing the common pitfall of updating a primary page but neglecting others that reference the same offer.
We pride ourselves on honesty and integrity; therefore, we do not retroactively alter published histories. When content changes affect the interpretation of what was previously published, we clearly note what was changed and when, preserving the original context rather than presenting a modified version as if it were the initial publication.
We are committed to full transparency and strive to leave nothing unnoticed or undocumented. Your trust is essential to us, and we work diligently to uphold it.
Reporting something more serious
If you suspect that our content could be misleading in a manner that may cause financial harm, please highlight this directly in your message, and we will address it as a high priority. Should you believe any material violates UK advertising or consumer protection regulations, specify the section and potential breach, allowing us to assess it against the relevant guidelines, rather than reflexively defending our content.
Should you experience issues directly with a provider, such as a delayed payment, an unexplained account closure, or a refused promotional reward, we regret that we cannot intervene directly. In such cases, your initial point of contact should be the provider, escalating to the appropriate ombudsman or regulatory authority if needed. Rest assured, we can guide you to the correct entity if you are unsure where to direct your concern.
We take claims of misleading content seriously and are committed to rectifying any issue expediently. Your vigilance in these matters helps ensure the quality and trustworthiness of our platform.
Why Accuracy Matters
Maintaining accurate information is foundational to our mission at PaymentCardReader.co.uk, particularly because financial decisions directly influence the viability and success of businesses. Errors not only erode trust but can lead to misguided financial planning and potential losses.
For UK small businesses, staying informed about accurate financial data is vital, given the rapidly changing economic climate, regulatory updates, and market practices. We are dedicated to providing up-to-date, precise, and reliable information, catering specifically to the needs of our UK-based audience.
Your trust is our greatest asset. We continuously strive to earn it by providing the most accurate, actionable, and relevant content available.
Frequently asked questions
How do I report an error?
How quickly do you respond?
Do you hide corrections?
What if I disagree with a recommendation rather than a fact?
Will you name me if I report an error?
Can a provider demand a takedown?
Editorial Standards & E-E-A-T Disclosure
This site follows strict editorial guidelines to ensure accuracy, independence, and transparency. We are a UK-based research publisher, not a financial institution.
- Lead Researcher
Haley DusterEditor and researcher, Payment Card Reader UK
- Verification Dates
- Published 4 August 2026Last Fact-Checked 13 October 2026
- Research Methodology & Basis
- "Desk research against official provider documentation. No hands-on testing has been carried out at the time of writing."
- Primary Sources & Evidence
- 1Tide — Plans and pricingPay As You Go and Sell In-Person subscription costs and published transaction rates. (Accessed 13 October 2026)
- 2Financial Conduct Authority registerChecking the regulatory status of payment and e-money firms referenced on this site. (Accessed 13 October 2026)
- 1
Trust Signals
- Independent ResearchWe are not owned by Tide. Our data comes from public fee schedules and regulatory filings.
- Editorial IntegrityCommission never influences our findings. We recommend competitors when they are a better fit.
- Accuracy GuaranteeWe log every correction. If you find an error, we aim to fix it within 24 trading hours.